Mark Atlas
★★
"The grid system is terrible. It doesn`t let you know if a specific space is within range to perform a certain action until you actually move onto it, and when you do, and it isn`t, well, you wasted your turn and went into an unfavorable position. It would be nice if the game gives you clarity on moves that you can`t take back, and give you a better idea of what your units and spells are capable of. It would really help you narrow down your options. Also, unrelated, but it NEEDS ranked matchups."
Version: 3.5.51
A Google user
★★★★★
"To everyone complaining that seasoned players are too OP. That may be true but I started out getting beat most of the time too and slowly built my cards up to be able to compete with higher levels. Also the card balancing is not off. This game is extremely balanced if you know how to build a deck. Every type of deck can win if it`s built right. Every type of deck can suck if it`s not. If you`re not doing good it`s because your deck isn`t built right"
Version: 3.5.51
Temerity
★★★
"Great idea but horrifically unbalanced. If you aren`t running the meta cards you will lose."
Version: 3.5.51
Maurizio Botindari
★
"Pay to win and unbalanced. Some creatures are unbeatable and uncounterable. You either have them or not. And to get them you got to find them first in those packages."
Version: 3.5.51
Teppo backup
★★★★★
"Best Tactics game you can play online that I know of. This is as good as Duelyst was. The only downside is the art but its worth shot even if you dont like it."
Greg and Alison Parrish
★★★★★
"This game is honestly my favorite game on playstore and I like how you get 25 free card packs. Although the sudden death takes the fun out of the game and the castles health should be at least 50 and if there was a villager or spell that could defend your castle and the map could be a bit bigger. Oh and one more thing why on earth is the yaarham*** giant an epic while dagger storm is a common."
Version: 3.5.51
Alamazing
★★★★★
"Not a bad game, I wish it would be a bit easier to make decks and wish there was a single player mode because I could playit on my breaks at school, besides that, nice game 3 stars fort game play, 1 star for the nice looking cards and 1 star for the dragons, all of them are cute (and the drakes) good game"
Version: 3.5.51
Destin Nguyen
★★
"As someone who came back to a basically entirely new game its not very new people friendly as the matchmaking system is currently broken, I don`t have many cards but the people I`m playing against have every single card in the game possible, that isn`t quite fair and ruins the game, dont get me wrong it`s a fun game, but I shouldn`t have to p2w to enjoy the game even more, 2 stars until mm is fixed"
Version: 3.5.51
OnlyHazardYT
★
"So hard to win in multiplayer."
PainkillerX
★★★★★
"Played since 2015 5 stars from me"
Version: 3.5.51
Cj Moncrief
★
"It`s p2w and you can have a nice deck and still get the worst cards 9/10 times"
Version: 3.5.51
Jack Stenson
★
"Matchmaking is ridiculous community has op meta where noobs will instantly lose any card they play"
victor
★
"Terrible matchmaking also what am i suppose to summon with 10 of gold and each turn the game s deck giving me 1 card"
Version: 3.5.51
Matthew
★
"Requires an account and internet"
Version: 3.5.51
monster slayer · can i hit 10 subs
★★★★
"COOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL"
Version: 3.5.51
Maverick Schmitt
★★★★
"Nice game! Cards are funny and full of potential lore! Can`t wait to play Cards and Castles 2!"
Version: 3.5.51
Off Meta Gamer
★★★★★
"The gameplay is solid, the factions are interesting, and it is more f2p friendly than most card games. It lacks the polish of a AAA title but if you can look past that then there is a real gem here."
Version: 3.5.51
Dan O
★★★★★
"I. Love. This. Game."
Version: 3.5.51
Lili !
★
"Another one ruined."
Version: 3.5.51
Password Security
★★★★★
"This is very nice game it is better than pvz heroes. In this game we can get many card pack once in battle and characters can be placed with our strategy"
Version: 3.5.51